At 08:08 AM 5/21/2003, you wrote: >The impression I get from people here is that clogs and frequent >head cleanings, windexing, head removal for cleaning, etc, are par >for the course with 3rd-party inks. I've never received a straight >answer here when I've asked why the 3rd-party ink makers can't get >their stuff as clog-free as the Epson inks. Maybe because it is more in accordance with human nature to sound off when there is a problem. Satisfied customers seldom contact customer service to render praise. That said, I am certainly a satisfied customer of both Mediastreet (color pigment ink) and MIS (b&w pigment ink). I have had a few clogs in a little over a year, but nothing major. And I live in Utah where humidity is very low year-round. Of course, as my CIS and CFS systems age, I can expect to need to replace them, but maybe I'll move up to a 7600 or something by that time. I don't know why the third-party inks clog more than the OEM inks, but it does seem to be true. On the other hand, if I don't print with my Photo 700 or my 870 for several days (both are used as office printers, not photo printers, and both use the stock Epson inks), I wll have to run several cleaning cycles to get good nozzle checks. But you're right, they don't seem to actually clog as solid as the pigment inks. Stan ================================ Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-21 by Stan McQueen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.