> But plenty of people here and on the Photo.Net digital darkroom forum > use stock Epson inks and I seldom hear THEM complaining about the > clogs-from-hell. Why wouldn't they complain just as much? I think it's important that you distinguish between the inks used and the method used to introduce them into the system. For example, none of the BW printing methods require you to use a CIS, but many choose to do so for practical reasons. Adding an external system to your printer with additional parts is bound to have different problems associated with it than a regular printer. If all you want to do is to compare the stability of the inks themselves you would need to compare cartridges prefilled with BW inks to original cartridges. The assumption would also be that when the cartridges were empty you threw them away and bought new ones, otherwise the refilling techniques used would be introduced as a factor and it would no longer be a fair comparison to originally manufactured cartridges. If you introduce other factors into the equation it may very well not be the BW inks themselves that are the problem, but the printing methods used, and that is a risk the user chooses for themselves. Both Piezography and MIS sells prefilled cartridges with a cost similar to original cartridges, so you could choose that approach for maximum safety. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink-jet better than wet prints (was Digital stuff)
2003-05-22 by Daniel Staver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.