Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons

2003-05-22 by Anthony Atkielski

Austin writes:

> Well, it is possible to come up with very good
> images converting color to B&W, and what "qualities"
> and/or "characteristics" someone else may deem
> "duplicate", may not be the ones YOU deem, but
> that doesn't make their belief incorrect.

And vice versa.  Sure, you can convert color to B&W with interesting
results, but that doesn't help if they are not the results that you want.

> Another issue is, why is duplicate important
> at all?

The reason photographers shoot B&W film in the first place is that they wish
to obtain a certain "look" that is unique to B&W film (and sometimes to a
_specific_ B&W film).  I don't see any reason why they should be expected to
sacrifice all of these flexibility and choice in favor of some color-to-B&W
half-solution.

> Why not take it for what it is, and if you like it,
> so be it, and if you don't, so be it.

Why give up what photographers already have?  There's no _advantage_ to
converting from color to various ersatz B&W renderings.  What's wrong with
continuing to shoot B&W in the first place?

> ... does it give you the results you want is what
> should be what is important, not trying to "duplicate"
> something.

If the results I want are Tri-X, then it must _duplicate_ Tri-X.  I'm not
interested in "almost as good."  And I know that many other photographers
feel the same way, which is why they continue to put real B&W film into
their cameras.

> Of course not, but it certainly may give someone
> an image that they are very happy with ...

Then again, it may not.  And in that case, they must shoot B&W to begin
with, or they won't be happy.  Why does that seem to be a problem?

> If you want Tri-X, shoot Tri-X, but not everyone
> wants the look of Tri-X.

Those who don't are not obligated to shoot the film, nor would I presume to
suggest that they do so.

> Also, Tri-X is simply not Tri-X.  It is very dependant
> on the development, and therefore one persons Tri-X will
> not be the same as another's Tri-X.

All the more reason to shoot Tri-X to begin with.  That might be difficult
to simulate from color.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.