Austin writes: > Well, it is possible to come up with very good > images converting color to B&W, and what "qualities" > and/or "characteristics" someone else may deem > "duplicate", may not be the ones YOU deem, but > that doesn't make their belief incorrect. And vice versa. Sure, you can convert color to B&W with interesting results, but that doesn't help if they are not the results that you want. > Another issue is, why is duplicate important > at all? The reason photographers shoot B&W film in the first place is that they wish to obtain a certain "look" that is unique to B&W film (and sometimes to a _specific_ B&W film). I don't see any reason why they should be expected to sacrifice all of these flexibility and choice in favor of some color-to-B&W half-solution. > Why not take it for what it is, and if you like it, > so be it, and if you don't, so be it. Why give up what photographers already have? There's no _advantage_ to converting from color to various ersatz B&W renderings. What's wrong with continuing to shoot B&W in the first place? > ... does it give you the results you want is what > should be what is important, not trying to "duplicate" > something. If the results I want are Tri-X, then it must _duplicate_ Tri-X. I'm not interested in "almost as good." And I know that many other photographers feel the same way, which is why they continue to put real B&W film into their cameras. > Of course not, but it certainly may give someone > an image that they are very happy with ... Then again, it may not. And in that case, they must shoot B&W to begin with, or they won't be happy. Why does that seem to be a problem? > If you want Tri-X, shoot Tri-X, but not everyone > wants the look of Tri-X. Those who don't are not obligated to shoot the film, nor would I presume to suggest that they do so. > Also, Tri-X is simply not Tri-X. It is very dependant > on the development, and therefore one persons Tri-X will > not be the same as another's Tri-X. All the more reason to shoot Tri-X to begin with. That might be difficult to simulate from color.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.