Jason, You are right about the number of pixels to measure but I was thinking about drawing the on screen representation with 65,000 individual bars in the bar graph as opposed to 256. Still might be trival in terms of the actual computing power required I have to admit. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Jason DeFontes" <jason@d...> wrote: > It wouldn't take any longer to calculate a 16 bit histogram. To calculate > the distribution of pixels values in an image you have to count every pixel. > The number of pixels to count is the same whether you're dividing the > distribution into 256 buckets or 64K. > > -Jason > (snip)
Message
Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Martin Wesley