Anthony, > > Every black and white film has a characteristic > > response curve, and that curve can be characterized > > for R, G, and B ... > > No, it cannot. The curve is just that: a curve. The RGB values are just > three numbers--equivalent to three straight lines of different heights in > the spectrum. Huh? And yes, it can be characterized, to some degree of accuracy. To characterize it for RGB, you would use THREE curves, one for each color, not just three numbers! > All the rest of the curve between those three lines is lost > when a picture is taken in color. I don't believe you know what you're talking about. The three colors (which are actually CMY), have overlapping regions. They are not brickwall cutoffs, they taper off on the ends. They in fact DO encompass the entire spectrum that B&W film does as well. The spectral response of Portra 400VC is 375nm to 680nm. The spectral response of Tri-X is 400nm to 650nm. So, in fact, Portra has a higher spectral response. If the spectral response of your color film encompasses that of the grayscale (which it does), and the film response is deterministic (which it is), and the conversion to RGB is also deterministic (which it is, and vice versa), then it can be characterized. Like you said, this is not mystical, it is purely good science, and obviously an understanding of how this really works without simply guessing. The operative words being good, understanding, and not guessing. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-22 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.