Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons

2003-05-22 by Bob Frost

Anthony,

I worry that you seem to be hooked on one particular artificial
interpretation of the world - that produced by Tri-X film, and seem to
denigrate other artificial interpretations. Others may like some of the
other interpretations, whether produced in Photoshop or some other chemical
mix in a plastic film. I don't see why one interpretation is any more valid
than any other - apart from the one fact that you like it.

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@...>
>
> > It's a subject that has concerned me for a
> > long time, as I've hinted at in past posts
> > about my fear of losing the look and feel
> > of particular films.
>
> I worry about it, too.  There is a very widespread but mistaken belief
that
> the images produced by any B&W film can be duplicated by some magic
> manipulation of a color image in Photoshop.  That just isn't possible.  In
> fact, you cannot even duplicate the images produced by a different color
> film or a different electronic sensor in Photoshop.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.