----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Nelson" <peter@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "donbga" > > > Who cares what the physical properties of these materials > > are from a practical point of view. > > I had a practical need for that information a few months ago here, > when I wanted to know more about the chemical and physical > properties of inkjet paper and inks so I could formulate an inkjet > receptive surface on true artist's canvas. (you can't paint > on "inkjet canvas 'paper'") > > My comment was about the cultural difference between the two > groups. I was struck by a lack of deep-down technical curiosity > about the underlying chemical and physical processes involved in > inkjet printing. Granted the majority of darkroom printers don't > have it eaither, but a significant minority do. Any active darkroom > forum will have a few people who can asnwer questions about > developer chemistry, for instance, but inkjet forums seldom have > anyone who knows anything about inkjet chemistry. Peter, I think that in to a large extent the type of info you are looking for is being closely guarded by the manufacturers which makes it tough to discuss the differences an effects. It would be like asking Ilford what their gelatin formula is for their papers. They just aren't going to publish that info. I would love to know more about ink receptor coatings, sizings and brighteners but I don't think we will get it. Martin Wesley
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-23 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.