donbga wrote (snip):
"Who cares what the physical properties of these materials
are from a practical point of view".
and Peter Nelson replied (snip) :
"I (am)struck by a lack of deep-down technical curiosity
about the underlying chemical and physical processes involved
in inkjet printing (among inkjet printers)".
In simpler times, some (like DaVinci) wore both the 'major artist'
and the 'major scientist' coats, but it hasn't been done in modern
times (since Goethe). Artists today make images, not scientific
explanations; (the converse limitation is true for scientists).
An image-maker's goal is to produce the deepest and richest image
he/she can, and to do this he/she uses whatever means are at hand
and deemed suitable. As Don (dongba) says, "from a practical point
of view, who cares".
Peter, your analysis/contention here seems superficial. Show me
a major photographer who understands his/her physical materials
in the same way a chemist or physicist does -- you can't.
A number of the best (chemical process) printers (e.g. P. Strand,
P. Caponigro, A. Stieglitz), who had/have a deep intuitive grasp
of how to use their materials, have made clear that they
do not employ a truly scientific understanding of the stuff they
work with -- and source material on this point is available, and you
could check it out. Further, painters and sculptors are just like photographers: they use what's at hand and what they consider
suitable, just like Don says; they care about how their image works,
and they don't rely on formal scientific understanding to do this.
Curiosity takes more shapes than you are allowing for. You need
to escape from your personal presumptions and look at what the major
practioners actually do.
And from my standpoint, I'll join the others who've said "Enough
already" to the extended discussion of the physics of 'digital,
film, and scanning'. It's not really germane to making deep and
rich printed images.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Nelson
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "donbga"
> Who cares what the physical properties of these materials
> are from a practical point of view.
I had a practical need for that information a few months ago here,
when I wanted to know more about the chemical and physical
properties of inkjet paper and inks so I could formulate an inkjet
receptive surface on true artist's canvas. (you can't paint
on "inkjet canvas 'paper'")
My comment was about the cultural difference between the two
groups. I was struck by a lack of deep-down technical curiosity
about the underlying chemical and physical processes involved in
inkjet printing. Granted the majority of darkroom printers don't
have it eaither, but a significant minority do. Any active darkroom
forum will have a few people who can asnwer questions about
developer chemistry, for instance, but inkjet forums seldom have
anyone who knows anything about inkjet chemistry.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-23 by John/Julie Gittins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.