Austin, Thanks, I confess I am somewhat new to all this (digital) and I am trying to figure out the best path to get the best B & W images using digital means. Since joining the group last week, I am feeling somewhat overwhelmed at the learning curve. I have been trying to follow the "digital,film scanning comparisons" thread as best I can as I get up to speed on all this before I make some decisions on which way to approach all this. In the meantime, I will read all the group archive articles and try to make sense of it all. About 10 yrs ago I was doing a lot of MF & LF B&W work and would like to explore the best ways and means to getting as close to what I am used to in silver printing via digital. I slipped away from photography to pursue "multimedia" and am now turning back to it. Any starting points you (or anyone else) can recommend as I begin this journey would be welcome. The extent of my digital involvement thus far has been with a Nikon 950 and an Epson 1270 printer. But I have a lot of MF&LF negs I'd like to work with going forward. So any help is most welcome, Regards, Tony www.lightworx.ca -----Original Message----- From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 1:03 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons Hi Tony, > Thanks all for this great discussion. As regards scanning neutral density > images (B & W) on a color scanner, Actually, I was talking about scanning using a ND filter over the CCD. Typically, film scanners scan B&W film using RGB filters... > would it make a difference if > instead of > changing the sensors, the light source was another color? I believe the Nikon scanners try varying the light source for the three different colors (RGB), and I guess if they wanted to, they could just scan B&W using white light...if that's what you're getting at. I don't believe they work that way now though...unfortunately. > I > presume the best > solution would be a sensor array that was not sensitive to color > at all but > just light intensity. It's the colored filters that make the CCD sensitive to a particular spectral range, without a colored filter (or simply using a ND filter), it is responsive to the entire spectral range it is sensitive to, which is far wider than the RGB range. Regards, Austin Yahoo! Groups Sponsor <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050191 82:HM/A=1564415/R=0/*http:/www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60164784&partid=3170 658> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupmai l/S=:HM/A=1564415/rand=933448972> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-23 by Anton Pickard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.