Clayton, Many thanks for your suggestion, as you say a lot of $$$ can be spent choosing a particular path and your recommendation on the flatbed really sits well with me as I move forward, and is something I had frankly not considered, thinking that a MF film scanner was what I needed but at this point I cannot justify the price tag. I also realize I also need to get out there and see first hand what the technology is capable of. My standards for quality are quite high, as I assume everyone else's here is as well, but it is also a subjective call unless we both happen to be looking at the same print at the same time and can agree on what a well executed image is. I live near Toronto, so being able to see good examples of well done inkjet images should not be too difficult. You have given me another perspective on all this and it is most welcome. Regards, Tony -----Original Message----- From: Clayton Jones [mailto:cj@...] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning compar Hello Tony, >trying to figure out the best path to get the best B & W >images using digital means. >Any starting points you (or anyone else) can recommend as I begin >this journey would be welcome. The extent of my digital involvement >thus far has been with a Nikon 950 and an Epson 1270 printer. But I >have a lot of MF&LF negs I'd like to work with going forward. Choosing a particular technical path is an expensive decision and one not easily reversed. You already have a 1270 and a body of work in your negs. I know from experience that you will learn an enormous amount by spending several months scanning and printing those. That way you'll make a much more informed final decision. There are many pathways and each have their advocates. It's hard to make a choice based only on what others say. I'm getting remarkably good scans of my 6x7 and 4x5 negs on an Epson 1640SU 1600dpi flatbed with tranny adapter (35mm is not acceptable). This level of scanner can be had for a relatively modest amount and will get you started. If you decide to continue shooting film you can invest in a film scanner, or if you decide to go to digital capture then you won't have overspent on the scanner. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm Yahoo! Groups Sponsor <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=247865.3269369.4566997.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050191 82:HM/A=1482387/R=0/*http:/ads.x10.com/?bHlhaG9vaG0xLmRhd=1053724679%3eM=247 865.3269369.4566997.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=1482387/R=1=105372 4679%3eM=247865.3269369.4566997.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=148238 7/R=2> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=247865.3269369.4566997.1261774/D=egroupmai l/S=:HM/A=1482387/rand=541975552> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Why is ND B&W scan better -- was Digital, film, scanning compar
2003-05-23 by Anton Pickard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.