> Hi, > > > Austin, thanks for asking - replies inline... > > > > > BH, > > > > > > > I did a series of tests with my printer, a 1270 using the Epson > > > > driver. Short answer: 360 or 720ppi print noticeable better > > > > than any other resolutions. > > > > > > > > Long answer: > > > > I'm fairly picky. I usually don't enlarge beyond 4-5x in the > > darkroom. > > > > I look at prints from 6" away. > > > > > > > > The _image_ resolutions I tested were: 840, 780, 720, 660, 600, 540, > > > > 480, 420, 360, 300, 240, 180ppi, 8-bit grayscale images printed from > > > > Illustrator. I created the different resolution versions by > > starting at > > > > 840ppi, and downsampling to each successively lower resolution in > > > > Photoshop. > > > > > > How do you know the downsampling isn't causing the visual > > difference in the > > > printout? > > > > The image files show no artifacts or moire on screen at 100% pixels. > > OK...but that doesn't mitigate that this is a possibility. > > > > > > > > My test image had some thin slightly diagonal lines > > > > (wood joints) which helped identify differences. The thing that > > > > immediately stands out is moiring(?) in these lines at image > > resolutions > > > > other than 360 or 720ppi. > > > > > > What was the actual original image scan resolution? > > > > It was a 6x7 TMX neg scanned @ 3200ppi on an Epson 3200, no > > "Epson sharpening" > > applied. > > But what was it printed at, with no downsampling/resampling etc? > > > > > Anyone else have experiences to support/contrast this? > > > > > > My tests show that scanning at the native optical resolution of > > the scanner, > > > and resizing the image without decimating the image (resampling) yields > > > noticeably better results than resampling. > > > > > > Did you try printing one with no resampling? > > > > No, do you mean setting the print size to various resolutions, > > and printing each? > > (Each test would be at a different magnification) I'll give this a try. > > No, simple as printing it the same size as the other prints you made, just > leaving the PPI to the printer fall where it may. Ah - I understand now. At the test's printed size, the image resolution would have been 2400 ppi. Making a print from this resolution shows no moire effect. Of course, the image is only ~3x3.6"... I also tried printing a small area of the image with no resizing at a particularly bad resolution: 540ppi. This print shows the moire as well, although it is somewhat obscured by the softness of the image at this magnification. - Brian
Message
Re: 360 dpi versus 300 dpi?
2003-05-24 by bu88ahu88a
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.