Digital BW, The Print

T59 *might* be a more sane approach.

BC
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kevin Gulstene 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 6:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Little OT -- Polaroid 55



  Thanks to all those who posted answers.

  I thought about using a digital camera to proof but the focal lengths 
  are so different between the digital camera and the camera I be using 
  that I didn't think it would be suitable. Also, the digital camera I 
  have doesn't allow full control of the aperture and shutter speed so I 
  don't think that is an option for me.

  From your answers it seems that a little experiential judgment (and the 
  correct EI) is required if I'm going to use T55 positives to proof 
  lighting setups for portraits when the final image will be made on a 
  silver negative -- or choose another polaroid film where the positive's 
  contrast range is closer to that of the negative film.

  Thanks again.

  --
  Kevin Gulstene
  http://www.dockwalker.com


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]