Kirk,
Just tried your suggestion for neutral B&W with the Epson 2200 driver
(your option 2 below). As you said, to expect that using the driver's
'PhotoEnhance' setting could result in prints "that look as if they were
done on cold-tone paper & toned in a dilute selenium solution for archival
preservation i.e., a very slight warming of the upper zones)" seems
pretty crazy. But like you, this is just what I found. I like these prints
as well as the best prints of the same images that I've been able to get
from my 1160 with FSN ink and Randall method.
I used Eclipse paper and converted the image to RGB before printing (no
additional changes to the image).
Other settings used:
- main driver panel: paper='EEM', ink='Color', mode='Custom'
- driver 'custom' panel: print quality='1440', high-speed='off',
color mgmt='PhotoEnhance4', tone='monochrome', sharpness='none'
- print panel: space='RGB', PrinterColorMgmt-switch='on'
Thanks very much for this very useful tip.
John
Original Message -----
From: Kirk Thompson
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 6:36 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Which B&W system/too broad I know
I'm addressing the frustrated person who wrote to say that he or
she found quadtone printing too complex.
1. In the Feb-Mar issue of Camera Arts, George De Wolfe said
that the Epson RIP software for the 2200 produces results very
close to quadtone. This is a cheap alternative to more advanced
RIP systems. I tried it & found that it produces interesting prints
that are not neutral, but look as if they were richly selenium
toned.
2. A more neutral result can be obtained by using the
Photo-Enhanced setting for the regular 2200 driver. When I first
read about this, I dismissed it as it as a crackpot idea - use a
distorted color setting to make neutral BW prints? But it does
indeed work, & produces prints that look as if they were printed
on cold-tone paper & toned in a dilute selenium solution for
archival preservation (i.e., a very slight warming of the upper
zones).
These are two options for those who don't choose a quadtone
system. While quadtone prints might achieve another increment
of excellence, these options look better than all but the best
printers can produce in a darkroom.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: Which B&W system/too broad I know
2003-05-27 by John/Julie Gittins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.