Steve: I think you've got it right. I usually adjust nothing in the scan, just use Vuescan with both the black and the white points set a -0-. Only when I get the 16 bit file into Photoshop do I set the levels. Of course, I'm sold on the Vuescan s/w. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Kobrin" <skobrin@h...> wrote: > There have been a number of recent posts about scanning that make me > wonder if I am missing something. When I scan, my sole objective is > to get as much information off of the negative as I can -- shadow > detail, highlights to the extent possible and as smooth a range of > tones as I can. I typically do not play with contrast or even adjust > the mid tones a great deal, assuming I am better off doing all of > that in PS when I have more precise controls and a much better image > to work with. The Nikon scan software seems to work well in this > regard. ( I scan in rgb and convert in ps as the Nikon scanner seems > to be problematic if set to B&W.) > > Should I be doing more than working with the equivalent of levels and > curves at the scanning stage? I guess the real question is what > a "better scan" would entail. > > > Steve
Message
Re: Scanning
2003-05-27 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.