Anthony, > Color negative film has the advantage of low density range; that is, the > range in density of the film between clear film and the darkest > part of the > negative is quite small. Quite small? Not necessarily. Portra has a density that goes up to 3. > This makes it easy to scan. It also limits the > tonal gradations visible on the film, but you can't have it both ways. No, that is absolutely wrong. There are MORE tonal gradations (as in it has a higher dynamic range) on negative film than there are on slide film, it's just a property of the type of film and how it responds to light. Slide film has a higher DENSITY range, but NOT a higher DYNAMIC range. Density range and dynamic range of the film are two entirely different things. > Conventional B&W film usually has a very broad density range, What film is that? Tri-X has in fact a narrow density range, like 1.8 to 2. > often so broad > that it exceeds the scanning capabilities of many scanners. Nonsense. Go look at the Kodak data sheet for Tri-X. It gives a density range of 2.0. > It also > provides extremely subtle tonal gradations (the flip side of > having a broad > density range). No, as I said above, tonality (dynamic range) and density are two different things. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal BW film for scanning ?
2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.