Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Optimal BW film for scanning ?

2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin

Anthony,

> Color negative film has the advantage of low density range; that is, the
> range in density of the film between clear film and the darkest
> part of the
> negative is quite small.

Quite small?  Not necessarily.  Portra has a density that goes up to 3.

> This makes it easy to scan.  It also limits the
> tonal gradations visible on the film, but you can't have it both ways.

No, that is absolutely wrong.  There are MORE tonal gradations (as in it has
a higher dynamic range) on negative film than there are on slide film, it's
just a property of the type of film and how it responds to light.  Slide
film has a higher DENSITY range, but NOT a higher DYNAMIC range.  Density
range and dynamic range of the film are two entirely different things.

> Conventional B&W film usually has a very broad density range,

What film is that?  Tri-X has in fact a narrow density range, like 1.8 to 2.

> often so broad
> that it exceeds the scanning capabilities of many scanners.

Nonsense.  Go look at the Kodak data sheet for Tri-X.  It gives a density
range of 2.0.

> It also
> provides extremely subtle tonal gradations (the flip side of
> having a broad
> density range).

No, as I said above, tonality (dynamic range) and density are two different
things.

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.