Todd, It was letter size but I bought a whole bunch a couple of months back so it might not be representative of what's currently available. I actually wouldn't mind sometime on the back to make it easier to quickly indentify the printing side but obviously very discreet and tasteful would be nice, i.e. don't put the marketing department n charge. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., tflash <tflash@e...> wrote: > You talking letter size? When was the last time you purchased? I would have > said you were overpaying, but if you are getting it without the nonsense, > maybe not. > > A couple of months back Epson, in their infinite wisdom, had decided to > decorated the back of their prints with their name and arrows running down > the long direction of the back of each sheet. If the Strathmore watermark > could be called elegant on their cotton writing papers, the Epson > "watermark" could be called schlock. > > You are blessed not to know of what I speak. > > However, due to customer pressure Epson said they would remove the watermark > in future releases, but I didn't think we were supposed to get clean stock > for a few more months. I don't know if you got old stuff or new. The Matte > Heavyweight never got the marks (I don't think), you sure you don't have > that? > > Todd > (snip earlier)
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Buying Archival Matte
2001-08-02 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.