You've got it! That's exactly the problem, and that's why you can never simulate the response of one film or sensor using data from another film or sensor. You can't get a Tri-X look from a digital RGB sensor, and you can't get a Velvia look from a Provia scan, and so on. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Dubovsky" <entropy@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 04:27 Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons > > I agree with Austin. Tell us precisely what information is > > missing. Don't speak vaguely about the "curves" because we know what > > the response curve is of the color dyes used in the film. So we > > know exactly how much to compensate the density by for any color. > > Or put another way: because we know the shape of the film's response > > curves there is only one unique point on the spectrum that will > > produce a given density in all three dyes. So what's missing? > > > > You say that other people here understand you, but I don't see them > > jumping in to clarify what you're saying. > > I think I need to weigh in again. Perhaps no one read my previous post. > *I* understand Anthony, at least on this point: > > It is a basic mathematical fact that the process of binning is *not* > reversible under almost all circumstances. > > Let's say that we have a spectral input of amplitude A(F), where F is the > frequency. Let's take two simple response functions (the same applies to > three, but I the extra lines clutter things up), r(F) and g(F). > > If we take two binning functions to collect r and g... > R = integral over all F of (A(F)*r(F)) > G = integral over all F of (A(F)*g(F)) > > Look at those last two equations. If I give you the result of the > integral (the R value, for instance) and the r(F) response function of the > filter/CCD combination, can you tell me what the input A(F) is? > > Answer: for all but the most trivial A(F) and r(F), no. For an arbitrary > A(F), never. > > More simply: if you know the exact spectral response of, say, the red > element of a CCD sensor, and I tell you I got a red value of 130, can you > tell me the original spectral input? > > Answer: no. > > -- > Jon Dubovsky ( entropy@... ) > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.