Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons

2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin

Anthony,

> It's very easy to demonstrate.  Take a picture in black and white using a
> narrow-band color filter.  Those are not difficult to find.  Then take a
> picture of the same scene in color without a filter.  Then try to convert
> the color image to B&W in a way that duplicates the same shades
> of gray you
> see in the B&W image taken with the filter.  You'll find that it cannot be
> done.

Who cares about that, but you?  I don't use colored filters for my B&W
images.  Ever.

You know, if this just doesn't work, then how come it DOES in fact work?  I
see B&W images made from color ALL the time, and they look VERY close to
"same" B&W images shot with B&W film...  So, how is it that thousands of
people already do what you claim impossible?

> The real-world relevance is self-evident to me and
> to several
> other people.

As it is to me too.  I can take a color image.  I can take a B&W image of
the same scene.  I can scan them both.  I can manipulate the color image
tonality such that it VERY closely matches the tonality from the scanned B&W
image.  I can do this manually, or I can do this programmatically, as I
believe it's a deterministic mapping.  As I said, thousands of people make
B&W images from RGB data every day.  Of course, some better than others.
But, as I said, if so many people are doing this so successfully, how can
you believe it's impossible?  I know, you'll argue the meaning of
"duplicate" and "successful" etc.

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.