Anthony, > It's very easy to demonstrate. Take a picture in black and white using a > narrow-band color filter. Those are not difficult to find. Then take a > picture of the same scene in color without a filter. Then try to convert > the color image to B&W in a way that duplicates the same shades > of gray you > see in the B&W image taken with the filter. You'll find that it cannot be > done. Who cares about that, but you? I don't use colored filters for my B&W images. Ever. You know, if this just doesn't work, then how come it DOES in fact work? I see B&W images made from color ALL the time, and they look VERY close to "same" B&W images shot with B&W film... So, how is it that thousands of people already do what you claim impossible? > The real-world relevance is self-evident to me and > to several > other people. As it is to me too. I can take a color image. I can take a B&W image of the same scene. I can scan them both. I can manipulate the color image tonality such that it VERY closely matches the tonality from the scanned B&W image. I can do this manually, or I can do this programmatically, as I believe it's a deterministic mapping. As I said, thousands of people make B&W images from RGB data every day. Of course, some better than others. But, as I said, if so many people are doing this so successfully, how can you believe it's impossible? I know, you'll argue the meaning of "duplicate" and "successful" etc. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons
2003-05-28 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.