Digital BW, The Print

Sanders,

In my fluorescent light fade testing, I've noticed no advantage to the light
UV sprays.  By the time I had enough coating on a print to see any
difference, the coating was distinctly yellow.  Window glass itself filters
out the shortest, most damaging UV, apparently.  So, unlike outdoor display,
I'm not sure any spray is needed for UV protection if you are just
displaying inside.

I do use the sprays for physical protection of matte prints that are likely
to be handled.  Print Guard works; there are a number of others out there
also.  Grumbacher Tuffilm is the latest one I purchased but not yet tried.
It is readily available at art stores and reasonably priced.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
________________________________________



-----Original Message-----
From: sandersm@... [mailto:sandersm@...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:53 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Preserving pigment inkjet prints, cont'd


Last week, I posed several questions to the list regarding outgassing and UV
protection for pigment inkjet (Epson 2200) prints mounted bare, without
glass.
  No one replied, so I went to Sam Flax and looked at the options.   Krylon
seems to own the market for sealants, so I tried two:   UV-Resistant Matte
Finish (1309) and UV-Resistant Clear Acrylic Coating (1305).

DO NOT USE THE MATTE FINISH ON EPSON 2200 INKSETS!   I ruined a print with
this stuff -- it changed the pigments rather dramatically, rendering the
previous natural skintones into an approximation of half-peeled sunburn.
It also
seems to leave a chalky residue on the paper.

The Clear Acrylic Coating, by contrast, did not seem to alter the image, but
it did add a gloss to the surface (I had printed onto Epson Premium Lustre).
It does not offend, but it also does not look as nice as the bare paper.

Does ayone on the list have a better suggestion, short of mounting the print
behind glass?   (I hate glass.)   Are there other products that offer some
UV
protection and smudge resistance, that are less detectable over pigment
inkjet
prints?

And, again, I would be grateful if someone could suggest the best way to
clean fingerprints and smudges from bare pigment inkjet prints, that will
not
disturb the pigments themselves.

Sanders McNew.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/