Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons

2003-05-28 by capuozzo

My two cents- it's really not critically important that I understand the
principles in creating b&w images from digital color in order to create art.

Capp




[capuozzo]


 From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:32 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Digital, film, scanning comparisons




  > > That's not relevant to the discussion.
  >
  > Of _course_ it is relevant.  The whole purpose of this list is to
discuss
  > black and white printing.  Black and white prints normally come from
black
  > and white images, and the latter are often produced with black and white
  > film and filters.  It's about as relevant as anything can get.

  No, Anthony.  The premise what that you can turn scanned color film data
  into a visually indistinguishable image (tonal wise) from that of the same
  image taken with Tri-X and scanned, period.  It was not about the use of
  filters.  That is another discussion.  FEW people actually use filters
  compared to the number that don't.  And as I said, it is NOT relevant to
my
  premise, and the reason you want to make it relevant is because you
somehow
  believe it mitigates the correctness of my statement, and it does not.

  > This entire discussion, in fact, is far more important than you seem to
  > realize,

  Being that I've been in the digital imaging business for over 25 years,
any
  discussion on digital imaging is very important to me.

  > because it has some pretty serious implications for
  > those trying to
  > reproduce one type of B&W print from something other than one type of
B&W
  > image.

  Yes, and that's why it's done all the time, whether you concur or not.

  > In particular, it is critically important that anyone shooting
  > color--such as digital color--and trying to get B&W from it
  > understand these
  > principles, so that he or she can understand why certain results can be
  > produced, whereas others cannot.

  That's very true...but my premise is still correct.

  > > Hum.  I see it done all the time.
  >
  > No, you see approximations.

  Everything is an approximation.

  Austin


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor





  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.