Hi Alessandro, > What I actually meant about scanners capability to change exposure time is > that I think they have it at least internally, i.e. they can adapt to > different images: whether or not this setting can be modified by > the user is > another matter Can you say what you mean by this? > As for the question "How raw raw scans are?" (we're getting philosophical > here :-), I assume it is the result of step 1 in the scanning process you > defined. Sorry, I wasn't paying attention. Raw scans are precisely the data out of the A/D, but "justified" in a 16 bit space, if the A/D is over 8 bits. There really is no standard for this, but I'd believe that low bit justifying the data might be the best way, as it's easier to work with for setting setpoints. The raw data does not have setpoints set, or tonal curves applied... > Austin promised to give these matters a thought, but I'm afraid he's still > on the "Digital, film, scanning" battlefield :-) Nope. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning
2003-05-29 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.