Hi Paul, > > ...If the file is only 360PPI, than the highest resolution > >it can print is 360/2 (because it's line pairs) /25.4 is 7.0866 lp/mm. > > Yes. I have used 720 and 1440 resolution test files for the higher > resolutions. Putting that size file in the files section might be a bit > much, however. I'd like it if you would ;-) > >> >>> 4. Do papers have a significant impact on > resolution/sharpness number > >> >>> of tones rendered and tonal transition > > > >> I have not measured the sharpness of the top RC papers, but my sense of > it > >> is that they show a lot more of the digital artifacts. Part of this > >> (probably most of it) is that the increased RC contrast makes defects > >> visible that were hidden on matte papers. > > >The ink goes in further with matte papers, I believe, which would mean it > >would spread more as well. > > As I understand it, however, one purpose of the inkjet coatings is to keep > the ink restricted and pull the water straight down. That is why the > uncoated papers are less sharp. With them the ink does spread > horizontally. My understanding as well! Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Which component is most limiting.
2003-05-30 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.