> >> Another thing I need clarification on is low-bit vs high-bit > >> justification. > I'm not quite there yet. But this is one of the > areas of this conversation I'd really like to understand, at least > superficially. Maybe if you speak a little to pros and cons of one over > another? Hum. Pro's and con's. I don't know that there are any, per se, it's just a way of storing the values. Let's see if I can come up with some ;-) You can't really make tonal adjustments on the low bit justified data...because there are no gaps between the data...what you would do with low bit justified data is set the setpoints, and then spread it out evenly over the entire 16 bit range. You could do the same with high bit justified data...but with high bit justified data, it's already spread out so before doing setpoints, you could do "some" level of tonal moves...not that you'd want to without setting the setpoints first. Low bit justified data would occupy a VERY small span of an 8 bit histogram...where high bit justified data would occupy a region, say it was 12 bit data, then when high bit justifying the 12 bit data, the region would be 16 times wider (4 bits is 16 times larger)...with 15 gaps in between every valid data value. Did that help?
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.