Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO

2001-09-28 by Nij

Or, to make things simple to program...
Two 256pixel wide windows: Top window shows 8 bit histogram, as you move
mouse over this, or perhaps click on a cursor-key, or whatever, the bottom
histogram could show you the 256 level wide detail of a particular 'hi-8-bit
value'.

Does that make sense?

Not quite a zooming / panning / all singing histo, but should be relatively
simple and quick to implement and run. At least... for those programs that
even bother to allocate a whole 256 pixels of screen real-estate to what
they must perceive as a boring histogram ;)

Nij



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason DeFontes [mailto:jason@...]
> Sent: 27 September 2001 20:23
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi
> PRO
>
>
> Yeah, I agree. If you represent the histogram as bar graph with a 1 pixel
> line for each value then the graph would be many many screens wide.
>
> That's not the only way to represent the information though. What if,
> instead of the height of a line, you used a gray scale value to represent
> the number of pixels at a given position (white for none, black for max
> count). Then you could represent your histogram as an image, giving one
> pixel of the "histogram image" to each of your 64K values. You
> could display
> all that data in a 256x256 pixel square, something you could easily see
> onscreen. Any white pixels in the "histogram image" would be the "gaps" in
> your histogram. I think that would give you a manageable way of presenting
> the data in a format that you could still interpret and get some
> value from.
>
> -Jason
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.