Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] medium format and epson 1280

2003-06-08 by Chris Hargens

Speaking of having negs professionally scanned, I've thought about 
going this route -- 
http://www.imagers.com/proscans/index.html -- 

for MF scanning. They use a Imacon Flextight 848 scan at 2000 dpi. 
$15 seems like a good price, assuming the quality is good. Anyone on 
this list have experience with this company or something similiar? 
I've also seen outfits advertising Nikon ED 8000 scans at around the 
same price -- greater dpi, of course, but I'm not sure the quality 
would be greater, although the file size would be greater and the 
print size could, therefore, at least in theory be larger. At any 
rate I wouldn't want to print much larger than 11x11 inches.

Chris Hargens

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Ken Carney" 
<kcarney1@c...> wrote:
> Hello, Manuel:  If you have a good 35mm camera now, and like the 
35mm
> qualities, my take is that you would be better off upgrading your 
35mm
> scanner, say to a Nikon Super Coolscan 4000ED.  Medium format 
doesn't really
> gain over 35, especially 6x4.5, unless you have an even more 
expensive
> scanner, e.g., the Nikon 8000.  Another route you might consider:  
If your
> images are somewhat static, i.e., you don't mind being tied to a 
tripod, a
> good used 4x5 field camera and a couple of lenses (say a 120 and a 
210mm)
> would give you a negative that would probably produce a good image 
with a
> high-quality flatbed scanner.  4x5 is convenient, that is you can 
develop
> each sheet separately as in the zone system, but there is a 
learning curve
> with camera movements and depth of field.  But the medium format is 
really
> neither fish nor fowl unless you have an excellent film scanner 
such as the
> Nikon 8000.  Or, of course, unless you have the negs professionally 
scanned
> ($$).  If you do go the MF route, be sure to look at the Fuji 6x9.  
Hope
> this helps.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   --Ken Carney
>     www.kencarney.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Manuel Toledo Quinones" <mtoledo@e...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:08 AM
> Subject: [Digital BW] medium format and epson 1280
> 
> 
> >
> > Dear Friends,
> >
> > I am considering moving up from 35mm into medium format. 
Specifically,
> > I am thinking about getting a Mamiya's 645E camera and an Epson 
3200
> > scanner to print bw on my existing epson 1280 using quadtones.
> >
> > Does anyone have experience with such a setup? Should I expect
> > significant print quality improvements? Right now I use the HP 
S20xi
> > scanner on my 35mm negatives.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Manuel
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
> resources on the homepage.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.