Digital BW, The Print

Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Peter writes:
> 
>> ...and also to produce a lighter, smaller, cheaper
>> wide angle lens (I'm talking about the 12-24mm zoom)
>> that is designed to cover the small CCD rather than
>> the whole 35mm frame.
> 
> Is the 12-24DX inexpensive?  I had heard just the opposite.

It's all relative I suppose. Whatever it costs, I guess it would
be a whole lot cheaper than a full-frame 12-24... <smile>

Peter Marquis-Kyle