In a message dated 6/15/2003 6:42:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: > The best you get is 100, the WORST you get is 50. In reality, you get a > range of 50-100. The 50 would be called "RELIABLY". > > Austin > Correct me if I'm wrong, but historically, haven't we put the lens MTF in parallel with the film MTF? Like tow 100 ohm resistors in parallel and invert the sum of their inverses in the process? and is "reliably"/planning for worst case? According to this formula, if either of the MTFs is any lower, the total MTF would be less than 50, reliably. If there's a more accurate formula, please enlightent me. Claude [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1588
2003-06-15 by claudej1@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.