Hello Claude, >>I have found from actual experience that I can get a better >>8x10 print from a 645 neg scanned on my 1600dpi flatbed >>than I can from a 35mm neg scanned on a friend's 4000dpi >>Nikon film scanner. At 4x5 or 5x7 it's a toss up, but by >>8x10 the difference becomes apparent. I can't explain this in >>numbers, but the difference is clear. I can only assume there >>is more information on the larger neg and that scanning the >>smaller neg at a higher resolution doesn't make up the >difference (it probably just gets more of what _is_ there). >I agree with this. So what's differeent between this and >traditional optical printing? The same rules apply. Nothing. I thought it was so obvious it didn't need to be stated. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1591
2003-06-17 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.