--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@a...> wrote: > Claude writes: > > > I paid off my Canon D-30 in two weeks. I shot 10,000 > > images with it and that would have been about $3,000 > > in film and processing alone... > > That's one photo every thirty seconds, for two straight weeks, full- time. It was live national dance competition on stage by available light12 hour days, and a new act about every 3 minutes, about 50 shots per act. There were others helping with the process, but I was the only shooter. The camera did get hot in my hands and I kept cycling through cards and battery recharges. All Jepegs. > What exactly were you shooting that required 10,000 images? And how long > did it take you to sort through them to find the keepers? The clients were sorting through them on several workstations. This type of work absolutely demanded digital capture. Also, picture packages were printed on dye sub printers. > What it _would have been_ in film and processing is irrelevant unless you were actually shooting the same number of pictures on film before you went digital. That is precisely my point. This job would have been impossible (for me) without digital capture. What it would have been in film is precisely relevant when on is making a comparison on cost justification. Assuming I could have processed the film and presented on Tamron Photovixes within 30 minutes of the shoot, the cost would have been the price of the camera body. EXACTLY my point and totally relevant. There are markets where film just simply cannot go and there are markets where digital capture simply cannot go. Landscapes is one that is better served with LF film, especially B&W. > > > ... except the market application demanded immediate > > printing and/or the sale of a CD with JPEGS on it. > > Ten thousand images is a lot of CDs. True, but not THAT many. Not when they are 1.3 Meg Jepegs. Had I booked all the acts, I could have shot 40,000, but I pre-booked rather do it on speculation. I really needed the Canon Eos 1d for that Job but it didn't come out until about 6 months later, and even then, there was a waiting list. I got by with what I had but I know I missed a lot of split second shots where I hit the trigger at the right time, but the camera refused to fire. The timing of those events requires anticipation. It's harder than it looks, but I digress............. Claude
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-18 by Claude
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.