A caution: I had a problem with Piezo inks. I no longer think they are
viable for longterm use in 1160. Hate to say that, that's just my
experience. My experience with MIS inks is new, so they are to be
taken as my initial impressions only.
After a year with Piezo inks, I'm discontinuing them. I can't clear my
printer fully of what is now called "Hayes Syndrome" on the Piezo
list. When I compare MIS Full Spectrum inks set up on a spare 1160
with the Piezo prints from my old clogging up with Piezo printer, the
Piezo inks definetly have a green tinge, and remnants of the other
symptoms.
I very much like the tone of these FS MIS inks, a bit warm but nice,
not sickly.
Until this problem is solved (and Cone says he IS working on it) I'm
not going back. I really don't mean to badmouth his setup<sigh>.
OTOH I find that even using John Woolf's workflow, when I examine
prints done with Epson driver ("error diffusion" setting") vs Piezo
driver with MIS FS inks, I can see dots in highlights and I get very
tiny tiny microbanding with Epson driver/Woolf workflow....but the
Piezo driver is smooth. This is counter-intuitive for microbanding,
but there it is. Please note that I only see the highlight dots and
microbanding when using my CRI 98 Ott-lite and viewing from 1 foot
away. I don't know why, but viewed under typical tungsten lighting of
varying intensity, I can't see the dots/banding at all.
The piezo driver seems (still some uncertainy)to print a bit
contratier than the Epson. In this case for some photos, I wonder if
the Epson driver still might be better, if a textured paper was used.
S. E. photo textured paper seems to "almost" hide the microbanding
even when I put the Ott-lite up real close.
I am curious if I have the settings wrong for the Woolf workflow. His
screen shot of settings did not match my driver dialogue choices, so I
e-mailed him as to the discrepancies (i.e. "Halftone" setting not
availabe, J.W.---->use "error diffusion" instead).
So, if I can swing it, I'll be using the Piezo driver with MIS FS
inkset. I am going to conduct my usual fade testing of some papers
profiled by Cone in this manner, as some on the Piezo list are aware I
already do.
Jim H.Message
Re: Getting started -- Cone or MIS?
2001-09-30 by Jim Hayes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.