if you're good at processing bw film, then you can very probably do better than a lab--you control the whole process including the developer choice, time, temp, etc. i used to do my own processing and kept my jobo pretty busy, but lately i just send my bw film to the lab along with my color. it saves me a lot of time, and although i can do it better, they do an acceptable job for me and i hate to process film. always trade-offs! :) scala must be processed in a scala capable lab. the proof is in the bw print at your final size, me thinks. kenb > From: B. Alex Pettit Jr. [mailto:a_pettit_jr@...] > Another short ( albeit OT ) extension of this thread .. > > I am currently having the film processed at a local lab. > They recommended Tmax100 as being most compatible with > their chemistry. May my results be quite biased by not > processing the film myself ? ( I know the few rolls of > PlusX125 showed significant grain )
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Ken Brookner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.