Rodrigo,
In theory you should be able to get better, smoother tonality in your
prints by doing all the work in a 16-bit space. In practice this is
limiting in Photoshop since most of the features are available only
in 8-bit space.
It is possible to work in 8-bit space and transfer the key
adjustments to 16-bit space which some people do. Up until the last
release of Piezo they were forced to drop to 8-bit at the end in
order to use the old Piezo driver.
Practivally speaking I have not seen any discussion yet as to the
advantages of printing from 16-bit space vs. 8-bit. You can also
print from 16-bit space using the Epson driver.
Martin
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., ramestic@e... wrote:
> Hello, after reading this list it really looks like an 8bit
workflow
> is "enough" for a desktop printer (like the 860/1160). Are you
using a
> printer like this ones?
>
> I still do not quite understand why the Piezo people put some
effort
> in delivering a 16 bit driver for printers like the ones obove.
>
> Comments are pretty much appreciated,
> Rodrigo
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson
> <jerryolson@r...> wrote:
> > Jim Do try the VM inks and Paul Roark's curves. Absolutely no
dots
> and
> > no banding.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim Hayes wrote:
> > >
> > > A caution: I had a problem with Piezo inks. I no longer think
they
> are
> > > viable for longterm use in 1160. Hate to say that, that's just
my
> > > experience. My experience with MIS inks is new, so they are to
be
> > > taken as my initial impressions only.
> > >
> > > After a year with Piezo inks, I'm discontinuing them. I can't
> clear my
> > > printer fully of what is now called "Hayes Syndrome" on the
Piezo
> > > list. When I compare MIS Full Spectrum inks set up on a spare
1160
> > > with the Piezo prints from my old clogging up with Piezo
printer,
> the
> > > Piezo inks definetly have a green tinge, and remnants of the
other
> > > symptoms.
> > >
> > > I very much like the tone of these FS MIS inks, a bit warm but
> nice,
> > > not sickly.
> > >
> > > Until this problem is solved (and Cone says he IS working on
it)
> I'm
> > > not going back. I really don't mean to badmouth his setup<sigh>.
> > >
> > > OTOH I find that even using John Woolf's workflow, when I
examine
> > > prints done with Epson driver ("error diffusion" setting") vs
> Piezo
> > > driver with MIS FS inks, I can see dots in highlights and I get
> very
> > > tiny tiny microbanding with Epson driver/Woolf workflow....but
the
> > > Piezo driver is smooth. This is counter-intuitive for
> microbanding,
> > > but there it is. Please note that I only see the highlight dots
> and
> > > microbanding when using my CRI 98 Ott-lite and viewing from 1
foot
> > > away. I don't know why, but viewed under typical tungsten
lighting
> of
> > > varying intensity, I can't see the dots/banding at all.
> > >
> > > The piezo driver seems (still some uncertainy)to print a bit
> > > contratier than the Epson. In this case for some photos, I
wonder
> if
> > > the Epson driver still might be better, if a textured paper was
> used.
> > > S. E. photo textured paper seems to "almost" hide the
microbanding
> > > even when I put the Ott-lite up real close.
> > >
> > > I am curious if I have the settings wrong for the Woolf
workflow.
> His
> > > screen shot of settings did not match my driver dialogue
choices,
> so I
> > > e-mailed him as to the discrepancies (i.e. "Halftone" setting
not
> > > availabe, J.W.---->use "error diffusion" instead).
> > >
> > > So, if I can swing it, I'll be using the Piezo driver with MIS
FS
> > > inkset. I am going to conduct my usual fade testing of some
papers
> > > profiled by Cone in this manner, as some on the Piezo list are
> aware I
> > > already do.
> > > Jim H.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks,
> Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page
is
> at:
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > >
> > > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > > - Include your full name with your message.
> > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier
messages
> to keep them short.
> > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the
subject
> header.
> > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> "flames."
> > > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and
the
> various resources on the homepage.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/Message
[Digital BW] Re: Getting started -- Cone or MIS?
2001-10-01 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.