Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: *.RIP vs. EPSON RIP for EPSON 2100/2200

2003-06-26 by johngeyles

> But there is an EPSON RIP around. First made available for the EPSON
> 2200, later for the EPSON 2100. I take it that it is the same piece
of
> software.

I can't tell for sure, but I believe you are talking about the
Epson "Pro" RIP, which is about $200.  Well, frankly, I think it's
shameful for Epson to charge ANYTHING for a product that allows
the printer to do what they strongly imply it can do "out of the
box", that is, produce decent (i.e. metamerism-free) B&W prints.
And some comments here suggest that the Epson RIP is poorly
documented and has a bit of a learning curve.

That being said, if you're on a Mac, there is a FREE product called
OpenPrintMaker, available at www.bowhaus.com/inkjetcontrol, which
does a pretty nice job.  If you spring for $200, you get a companion
tool that enables you to customize your profiles, which capability
I THINK is unavailable elsewhere at ANY price.  For the free product,
there basically is no learning curve.

People here also are discussing something called QuadTone RIP; 
I'm not sure what it costs, what printers/inks it works on, etc.
But there's a lot of talk about it - people seem to like it.
What the pros and cons  are versus OpenPrintMaker, I'm just not
sure.  I'm confused too ...

John

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.