Tom: Price on IP5.5 LE is $295 through Lexjet. Duncan --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom OConnell" <TomOC@s...> wrote: > Chatzebussi - > > The IP 5.5 lite is $495 and it doesn't have a very user friendly > upgrade policy or maintainence (i.e. they have it but it is very > expensive). Their new documentation is pretty good and there is a > yahoo group that is very supportive and can help you with almost any > problem. > > The Epson RIP was wildly anticpated and equally disappointing by > report of the early adopters (no updgrade that I know of) and > probably isn't worth the $200. > > There is a new rip that sounds great called Pixelpicasso sold by > www.bwguys.com but it isn't for sale yet in the 2200 flavor and the > pricing for the 2200 isn't yet known (the wide format version is > $1500). > > Image Print is a little clunky on the interface side, but once you > get used to it, it does make outstanding prints, and it's available > today. > > The only other suggestion I have for windows users is to use > pictorico paper and use the profiles and workflow that they have > created and are available for free downloading on their site. I tried > these while I was waiting for my copy of IP to arrive and I must say > they were pretty darn good (if you work with them for a while you can > most likely make excellent prints ...on thier paper). > > The advantage of IP and PP is that they have lots of profiles (more > than 200 with IP and PP says they will have more than 50)...both also > are great for color (though the Epson driver seems to be pretty good > for color, too). > > You've seen the other posts on a couple of really good MAC > solutions...this is the first time in my life I have considered > getting a MAC (but sanity finally prevailed <g>...the OPM runs on OS9 > (yuk) and the quad rip written by Roy is )OSX (and also free). > > You can almost buy a used mac for the price of these rips...that > really got me thinking <g>. But I don't want to be messing around > with 2 operating systems, life is complex enough and I have too much > other software that is windows only, I'd wind up psycho... > > Hope this helps, > > Tom O'Connell > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "chatzebussi" > <chatzebussi@y...> wrote: > > Hi out there > > > > So many RIPS around now, one could easily get confused. Most of them > > far too expensive for the > > avarage black-and-white amateur though - others not yet ready for > the > > PC-Platform... Hélas! > > > > But there is an EPSON RIP around. First made available for the EPSON > > 2200, later for the EPSON 2100. I take it that it is the same piece > of > > software. > > > > looking at the pictures here > > > > http://studio-nelson.com/inkjet/bw22003.htm > > > > I would have thought that it isn't doing too badly. I am considering > > buying it as it is rather modestly priced. Any advice? Any serious > > drawbacks? I am a bit suspicious as this RIP doesn't seem to belong > to > > the favorites among the members of this group. In fact it is hardly > > ever mentioned. > > > > Thanks for replying and your info > > > > Chatzebussi
Message
Re: *.RIP vs. EPSON RIP for EPSON 2100/2200
2003-06-27 by Duncan Staples
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.