It sounds impressive...it's a pity we can´t give it a try,because IP does not have a demo of any type. I know they're working on a version for the Canon i9100,and it's very tempting,but layering 500 bucks without a seeing first... 30 days just-send-it-back works if you live in USA,but living in Brazil it's not an option...too bad... --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mitch Alland <malland@x> wrote: > For: André Vallejo > > > Mitch,when you say "I also like the absolutely neutral grayscale that > > ImagePrint gives, and > > the subtle toning that is possible with TintPicker." does it mean > > really > > neutral,comparable to a quad,under several kinds of light? Because > > I've read > > so many times that this is impossible with color inks(and it makes > > sense by > > definition) that I'd like to hear a liitle more from you about it... > > Yes, I mean really, really neutral -- without the warm tone that I had > with Piezography inks. The "toning" with TintPicker is very subtle > rather than introducing color cast like the Piezography warm tone, (I > haven't used the latest Piezotone inks). > > My b&w prints with IP are just as good as my Piezography prints but I > like them better because they don't have the Piezography warm tone. > > > I also like being able to use the same printer for color and b&w, which > IP makes possible. > > --Mitch/Bangkok
Message
Re: ImagePrint vs StudioPrint/PosterPrint
2003-07-17 by Andre Vallejo da Silva
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.