Hi Shilesh, Thanks for your observations and for suggesting alternative methods of printing PiezoTones on the 1280. The old driver is very slow, as you say, 16 minutes for a small print as compared to 6 minutes on the 2200 with ImagePrint. I am very happy with B&W prints made using ImagePrint on the 2200. Fast and easy to use. Many say the prints are neutral. However, at 50,50 tinting they seem slightly warm to me, but not as warm as PiezoTone Selinium Tone. I like both renditions. However, for more tonal variation I look to PiezoTones. I would imagine that the new PiezoTone system will make them easier to use and give better results, except, perhaps for customized approaches like yours. Ron --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" <shilesh.jani@s...> wrote: > Ron, > > I agree with you! This special luminous quality is restricted to > some images and under specific light condition. I see this also in > BO printing. Use of pigmented grays in highlight areas impose the > quality of inks, rather than allowing the paper to assert itself. A > long time ago - 1.5 years;-) I was using dye based inks for b/w > printing. And sure enough, the paper character was more readily > apparent in the highlights. Too bad about color crossover and fade > of color dyes. I am looking forward to the day when we get a dye > based grayscale inkset, even one which has a limited lightfastness of > 20 years. But that is just me. > > On the microbanding front: It should be noted that the Piezography > plug-in is not the only way to go with the 1280. One can use the > Epson driver along with the MIS FS (and FS-N) inks designated "E". > Alternatively, you can use the regular FS (and FS-N) inks provided > you switch the inks around as follows: cyan=magenta=dark, > lightcyan=lightmagenta=middle, yellow=light. A moderate curves > adjustment layer (call it profile) linearizes the response nicely. > No plug-in, no banding. Also in fairness, I have seen a lot of > prints made with the Piezo plug-in and PT inks with no evidence of > banding. I personally don't use the plug-in because I like the > ability to custom mix my own inks, and the plug-in (mis)uses too much > ink, and it is slooooooooooooow! > > Regards. > > Shilesh
Message
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by harrisimages
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.