Bob Frost wrote: >Peter, > >Does it really matter that you can see dots in an inkjet print? > Bob, you seemingly never fail to take a position supporting an OEM EPSON option... If the elimination of dots visible to the naked eye is relatively unimportant, I guess EPSON should have stopped at the 3000 then... ;-) You sound like the guy with an old clunker who asks "when do I ever need to go 85 mph?" The fact is, the ability to go that fast or to print without visible dots is an indicator of technological prowess and/or system health. The fact is that elimination of visible dots in inkjet prints has been a goal for a LOOOOONG time (witness the work many on this list have done to get better and better B&W prints WITHOUT visible dotting). It has been an extremely useful benchmark.. Now some of the BO printing people are trying to use a "dots are beautiful" campaign to convince us that we were wrong all the time we believed that eliminating dots was a sign of progress... I suppose less grainy 400 ISO color film than we had available 20 years back is not an advance either? To compare it to conventional film: Yes, in certain situations, visible grain is a great artistic/aesthetic tool. however, the advance of technology allows one to choose whether or not, in many circumstances, to have visible grain. To say "who cares about dots" is to ignore the reality of measuring inkjet technological progress by the approach to a naked eye invisible dither. Another note... Suppose the B&W image one is planning on printing uses grain to effect.... Printing that image in "dotless" B&W allows the grain to really demonstrate its patterning. While printing it through the medium of a dotty dither certainly changes the grain pattern's visual impact. There's a difference between being forced to have dots no matter what one does, and being able to use it as a tool. Imagine being able to ONLY EVER use blue tones to paint. Sure it could be done, and might be a nice effect. But, having a whole spectrum of paint to work with axiomatically gives one more overall artistic freedom (whether or not one chooses to exercise that freedom is nearly irrelevant). Finally, with visible dots, we head back to a situation in PhotoShop where our on monitor image axiomatically reproduces the final print less faithfully, as you cannot accurately predict and display the pattern on-screen in PhotoShop. "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-27 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.