Oh, this is getting tedious. BO printing is great. Quadtone printing is great. Hextone printing is great. The piezo driver is great too, blah, blah, blah... There, I've said it. Don --- Matthew Carlisle <matthewcarlisle@...> wrote: > Can't we all just get along? ;) > > I'm willing to bet that there are many people that > are 100% satisfied with > BO printing, purely because they're not looking for > critically perfect tonal > range, they're not putting their work in museums, > and they just want to > print the occasional print in B&W without it looking > crappy with color inks. > After all, 99% of the population are entirely happy > with $100 "boom boxes" > that sound like crap, but they still enjoy the > music. > > For most of us on this forum BO printing doesn't > come up to the standard we > like, but that doesn't mean it's not OK for others > that aren't as fussy as > all of us (yes, I'm talking to you). > > Your fellow B&W elitist, > > Matthew > Hello Matthew, > > >I never said you said you can't see dots. I was > just kidding around > - I think we need more of that on this forum. :) > > Ok, point taken, and I agree. > > Some people have inferred from my remarks some > things I didn't say, so > for the record: > > 1) I have never said that BO is better than good > quad/hex printing. > > 2) I would like a dotless quad/hex solution as > much as anyone. I > agree that dotless printing has been and is a > worthy goal. > > 3) My advocacy of BO printing has been because it > is a good interim > solution for: > > ..a) someone who has struggled unsuccessfully with > quad/hex methods > and needs a "life raft". > > ..b) a newbie who is confused by all the options > and needs time to > gain some experience and sort things out before > investing a lot of > money in a system. > > 4) The main reason I have been so vocal about it > is that I feel that > BO has gotten a bum rap, and that it deserves to > be accepted as one of > many available techniques so that people who may > benefit from it do > not dismiss it out of hand. > > The reason I began this thread is that Peter's > remark about BO being > contrasty is one which he has made before, some > months ago, which > generated a very similar discussion. I was > dismayed that he would > want to beat this dead horse all over again. > Peter seems to be, as > Martin said, "compelled to attack it...harshly". > > Lastly, I don't know if keith's remark was > directed at me, but I am > not on a "dots are beautiful campaign". Lots of > people read this > forum for information and I've received many > emails from people who > thanked me for turning them on to BO printing. > Therefore I want to > continue to portray it in a positive light. The > prints have a unique > look about them which resembles Tri-X in a way, > and a well done BO > print can be strikingly beautiful, with deep > blacks, brilliant > highlights, and silvery midtones. However, I am > not in love with > dots. If I could get the same intense beauty > without the dots I'd be > happy as a clam. One day the right system will > come along and I'll > spring for it. We keep getting closer. My only > "campaign" is for BO > printing to be accepted as one of many options. > > Regards, Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the > Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The > page is at: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily > digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences > by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have > one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of > earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to > change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No > personal attacks or flames > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message > archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! > Terms of Service. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-28 by D. Hill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.