Depending on the paper used, I think it would be difficult to see pixel by pixel - even with a loupe. It is however a worthy experiment so I will check it out. On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 10:10 AM, Peter Nelson wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Loring Palleske > <lorpal@m...> wrote: >> NO. Dithering is not done on a pixel by pixel basis. >> >> On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 02:33 PM, Peter Nelson wrote: >> >>> Think of it this way - at maximum printer resolution it can only >>> represent 46 distinct tonal values in the surface area of the > paper >>> where the pixel might have any value from 0-255. >> Regards, > > Actually, we don't know WHAT the dithering algorithm they use is. > BUT there's a simple test you can do, which I've done on all three > of my inkjet printers (HP 970CSE, Epson 870, and Epson 2200): > Create a test pattern of individual pixels and one-pixel-wide-lines > separated by one-pixel white space. Create the image and print it > without doing any rescaling, so the pixels and 1-pixel wide lines > are sent to the printer AS 1 pixel. Just for fun, do this at > different resolutions - I've tried it at 240, 300, 360, 400, and 600 > PPI. > > You will find that they are individually rendered and distinct under > magnification at resolutions up to 360 or so DPI, depending on the > printer. > > In reality we have some good evidence that the 2200 resamples before > dithering. But if they did a stochastic dither over an area greater > than 2 pixels-width than adjaecent pixels would blur together. > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Free shipping on all inkjet cartridge & refill kit orders to US & > Canada. Low prices up to 80% off. We have your brand: HP, Epson, > Lexmark & more. > http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510 > http://us.click.yahoo.com/GHXcIA/n.WGAA/ySSFAA/ucIolB/TM > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls > and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > Regards, Loring Palleske Creative Imaging 905.441.2661
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Myth: was Any New 2200 BW for PC's?
2003-07-28 by Loring Palleske
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.