> > For information purposes only; it won't solve the problem. > > > > I use the 980 along with the 1160 but with the MIS FS ink set. John > > Woolf has a workflow for both machines. Both work very well in that > > there are no visible dots unless you use a loupe. For the 1160, I > > prefer the workflow by Jeff Randall, no dots even with a loupe. > > > > The Roark flow also gives good results on the 1160 with the FS inks, > > but dots are visible with a loupe. Randall's workflow is the best, > > IMHO. > > > > Harry Lockwood > > I was wondering about the differences between the Vm and FS inkset. Does > the Vm set basically make it with three black dilutions (plus blue) vs four for > the FS inkset? Does that make it more prone to dots (for those that insist on > looking with a loupe?). > > Let me reiterate that the 5% has dark dots in it. Seems unlikely to me that the > darker ink would come in so soon. I wonder if I either have a problem with > ink positions or dilutions. Kiefer's post above suggests maybe I do. > > Costa Costa, I can't comment on the VM inks because I've only used the FS set. But if your ink positions are in question, then all diagnostics are off. Harry Lockwood
Message
Re: 980 and MIS VM
2003-07-30 by hlockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.