RSbimer2001, > You missed my point completely. But...you CLEARLY stated "They should not be compared..." and I certainly didn't "miss" that! > Which is: what medium you use is > unimportant,if your vision is strong and you know your medium of > choice then it won't matter what you present it on, How would you "know your medium of choice" without comparing them? Random guess? Someone else told you what your choice should be? Use the force? > except to those > who have bias toward one medium or the other, and I don't choose to > pay much attention to those people. They have an agenda that means > nothing to me, except agrivation. I want responce to the content not > the container. But in this case, sometimes the container makes a big difference. You can't keep oil in a paper envelope. > I print in both mediium so I have no particular bias toward either > medium. I use both as well my self, but one works better, for me, in some situations, and the other in other situations, and without spending some time using both, and comparing my results, I would not have been able to conclude what works better for me. Simple as that. You ALWAYS have to compare things...day in and day out, or you'd simply eat cereal 3 meals a day! Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Bruce Barnbaum on digital photography
2003-08-11 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.