I use the Polaroid SS4000 as well and in my opinion it is the best sub-$500 scanner on the market. You may not have the scanner focused correctly. I use the SS4000 with VueScan and you can calibrate the focusing, which you may need to do. As buggy as VueScan tends to be it is still much better than the Silverfast AI5.5 or the included Polaroid software. Duncan --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Stan McQueen <stan@s...> wrote: > At 12:49 AM 8/15/2003, you wrote: > >My experience with the original SS4000 was very disappointing. I purchased > >a refurbed demo directly from Polaroid and had to sell it in a month. > >Previous to that I was using a low-end Canon 2720. The Polaroid may have > >had subtley better dmax; but, the 4000 dpi vs the 2700 dpi simply didn't > >matter at all. The most glaring imperfection of the Polaroid is the lack > >of sharpness. It was simply no sharper then the Canon 2720, which is/was a > >basic 3.0 dmax/ 2700 dpi scanner. > > I've been using the original SS4000 for well over a year now and it looks > tack sharp to me. I don't use the Polaroid software, which someone else > pointed out had a focus bug in early versions. I use Vuescan with all three > of my scanners (SS4000, 45i, and Epson 2450) and have had no problems with > focus. > > Stan > > ================================ > Photography by Stan McQueen > http://www.smcqueen.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] re: B&W Printing . . . Polaroid SS4000
2003-08-15 by Duncan Staples
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.