The chromogenic films are finer grained than typical 400 speed color film... at least from what I've seen. They also scan much better than 400 silver based films. I would rather scan a 100 speed color film over the chromagenic films, but sometimes you need the speed. I have never gotten a good commercial print from a chromogenic BW film... but they are good enough for rough proofs to know which one is worth the effort of *processing* and printing. mark ... > I am curious as to why people who engage in a hybrid-digital B&W > workflow (shoot film and scan) would really want to use a chromogenic > film. As for being true B&W, these films are conceptually as B&W as > printing greyscale with a cmyk inkset and without offering any of the > traditional characteristics of silver based film over that of colour > print film - eg expanded exposure ranges. > Almost all the chromogenic are softer (resolving ability) than colour > print alternatives; and as Photoshop (or similar software) is an > inevitable component of the the digital B&W end-to-end workflow, > shooting in colour print and converting to B&W in the computer surely > offers greater flexibility and control over contrast and tonal > adjustments ...and surely colour print conversions cant be considered > any less B&W than the using a chromogenic! > > regards > Craig
Message
Re: chromogenic films
2003-08-18 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.