First of all, I think that there is no comparison between photography and fine art painting, but just because a painting takes hours to complete doesn't mean that it has any real value at all. There are many terrible painting done by bad artists every day which have no value. Photos are different, even traditional prints. Many traditional prints can be duplicated just as successfully as digital images, in fact I would avoid almost taking any shot that I knew would require hours of darkroom manipulation... since there are infinite images to grab, while pick ones that are going to be hard? Value is set by those paying for the photos, there is no inherent value to anything. If people are happy to pay you might as well be happy to sell to them:) mark ... > There seems to be a lot of people on this site that sell their digital > prints. How have you rationalized this in your mind? Do you sell a limited > edition of an individual print? Once you sell out of a popular print are > you tempted to hit "print" again and make more? It would be easy wouldn't > it? :) > > What does everyone think about this? ...
Message
Re: The Value of carbon B&W Prints
2003-08-31 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.