on 10/4/01 11:38 PM, Austin Franklin wrote: >> I'm not exactly sure I was testing the overprinting in the context you are >> referring to, but I did overprint my "blacks" with good results on an 1160 >> with EAM. Perfect registration with a VISIBLE doubling of >> density. > > I don't know that you really mean visibly doubling, I certainly believe it's > darker... Your right, I didn't mean to accentuate the word so as to mean an exact doubling, just that the effect was indeed visible. If anyone is curious to see the effect just make two black squares in PS and get them to partially overlap. Like I say, it's probably not worth the extra work for most images, but it's worth keeping in one's bag of tricks. > But my real point is, the driver COULD if it wanted to, overprint anywhere > it wanted to as a course of routine business. I don't know why Cone doesn't > do that just to increase the black density... It should be pretty > deterministic, I would believe? Hmm, My guess is that if the driver were doing it on-the-fly you might get ink bleed / dot gain, which would sacrifice detail, but with some dry time between applications the paper holds the ink better? Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Dithering THOUGHTS
2001-10-05 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.