Hi Clayton, thanks for taking the time to publish your comments, this is very valuable information. I have one question, though: the first review reads "1160, Epson Driver, MIS FSN, Randall/Wolf Curves": given that the Randall and Wolf workflows are very different (only the former using a partitioning curves), it's not clear to me how the evaluated print was printed. I suspect, given that you say it's dotless, that Randall curves were used, but then I also see you rated the shadow detail as "poor, bordering on very poor", which I find hard to believe, as I get very good results with this workflow on the Tyler Zs test (although I use FS inks, not FSN, which may make a difference). I am willing to submit a print, if you're interested, and if the fact that I'm in Italy isn't a problem (I have lots of bandwidth, though, so I could download the test image). Alessandro -----Original Message----- From: Clayton Jones [mailto:cj@...] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 0:39 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Tech Print Exchange Results Hello All, A review of last spring's Technical Print Exchange organized by Tom Fors is now available on line. <snip> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Tech Print Exchange Results
2003-09-08 by Alessandro Pardi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.