-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So I'm starting to get some REALLY good results from my 2200 with the UT inks and the modified Roark curves (thanks Daniel!). The major problem I have now is compression in my shadow details. A really dark print looks pretty lousy. I was wondering if I need to switch to the Eboni black ink. I'm using the UT Photo Black that came with it on Epson Semigloss paper. I'm getting the same results on EEM too, but I expected that since it's not a matte ink. Any ideas? How do I go about troubleshooting this one? Should I post a step wedge scan for people to look at? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/Zc5Ru7srlnPHEE8RAjHcAKCQGRzI75AVEvUpCI7V7rO0w1YJQgCgmDIk XkwcrlEoV7USFlTg7Em7ftc= =9kRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Message
MIS UT in 2200 w/ Roark/Staver curves: shadow compression
2003-09-15 by Justin Florentine
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.