Digital BW, The Print

I also have a Nikon 8000.  It's a GREAT piece of equipment (there are also other good 4000 dpi scanners).  If you calculate the equivilant pixel count when you scan a 6x9cm piece of film with a 4000 dpi scanner, you end up with about the equivilant of a 96 megapixel sensor (I'm sure someone will get the correct number on this.)  Neverthess, it's an impressive number.  I've seen the color out of the 11mp Leaf, but they don't seem to show the b&w.  The color is excellent, but the b&w may have some issues.  Get a dealer to let you scan one of your b&w negs, and you can compare for yourself.
 
Tom Baker

Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> wrote:
Steve,

>...I currently use 2 camera systems - the Contax 645 and
>the Canon 1N ...
> At the moment I have a relatively cheap scanner, the
>Epson 2450 Photo.  I have not been that impressed ...

>So my question now is should I upgrade my scanner to, say,
>a Nikon 8000 ...

Yes.  The Nikon 8000 made a huge difference in my overall workflow.  With
medium format Tech Pan I print at 22 x 28 inches in my 7500 with Ultra Tone
inks and get essentially perfect images.  The sharpness holds up even when
people get their noses into the print, and the image is virtually grainless.

So, if those are your goals, the Nikon 8000 -- or an equivalent scanner with
a grain reduction option -- will be much better than the alternative
solutions that I lived with until the 8000 was available.


>... can a scanner get close to a high end digital camera these days?

For B&W work, I think the question should be reversed.

Recall that the digital cameras use RGGB sensors, typically.  Each one of
those colors is called a "pixel" in the ads/resolution ratings.  With a
scanner, however, each pixel is a full RGB pixel (or grayscale pixel).  So,
the B&W resolution of digital cameras is not as high as the scanners' rated
resolution.  If, for example, I applied a "red filter" in the computer to a
digital camera's "pixel," I'd have, effectively, 1/4 the rated pixels.

The color image quality of the digital cameras is great, but for B&W, I
think we have a few years to wait before the portable digital cameras will
be able to match medium format B&W film.  In fact, the B&W, high resolution
market may be so small that digital cameras for that market may never be in
my budget category.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com



Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]