At 04:27 AM Monday 9/29/03, you wrote: >Russ, I agree. The 3200 is an excellent scanner. > >I use it with a 1280 running the piezography driver >and could not be happier with the results. I scan >everything from 35 to 4x5 Thanks for this discussion. I currently shoot only 35mm, but plan to move to 120 as well. After setting my sights on the Minolta 5400, you have prompted me to have a re-think (especially after re-reading the i-photo review). I am now thinking that it might be a better idea for me to start with the 3200, because it will do all the film sizes that I will use - so, when I go to 120 film, I won't have to get a second scanner. If I got the Minolta 5400 now, I would have to buy a second scanner eventually (when I move to 120) - so it makes sense to get the 3200 first, in case I find it adequate for my 35mm needs. I really do want to be able to get exhibition-quality prints from 35mm, which is what has held me back from buying the 3200 for 35mm negs. Any thoughts? thanks, Richard ------------------------------ photos: http://photos.smallfield.vze.com homepage: http://smallfield.vze.com favourite website: http://www.masters-of-photography.com/ "Kindness is the golden chain by which society is bound together." --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, poet, dramatist, novelist, and philosopher (1749-1832)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-28 by Richard Smallfield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.