Jeff writes: > Once you shoot 4x5, anything less becomes intolerable. This is the main reason why I have not experimented with LF. Once I've tried that, everything else will look unacceptable, and currently I can't afford the time or film costs of LF, and I have no way to scan it (if I can't scan it, I can't use it). Once I tried MF, 35mm looked fuzzy. And 35mm makes digital look like a toy camera. So I can imagine what would happen if I tried shooting large format. Additionally, as you point out, LF doesn't have the convenience of 35mm. But once you've shot a larger format, you tend to lust for it in _all_ photos, not just the photos for which it can be practically used. So everything less looks a bit disappointing in comparison, no matter what the shooting situation.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT MF film sizes
2003-09-29 by Anthony Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.