Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT MF film sizes

2003-09-29 by Anthony Atkielski

Jeff writes:

> Once you shoot 4x5, anything less becomes intolerable.

This is the main reason why I have not experimented with LF.  Once I've
tried that, everything else will look unacceptable, and currently I can't
afford the time or film costs of LF, and I have no way to scan it (if I
can't scan it, I can't use it).

Once I tried MF, 35mm looked fuzzy.  And 35mm makes digital look like a toy
camera.  So I can imagine what would happen if I tried shooting large
format.

Additionally, as you point out, LF doesn't have the convenience of 35mm.
But once you've shot a larger format, you tend to lust for it in _all_
photos, not just the photos for which it can be practically used.  So
everything less looks a bit disappointing in comparison, no matter what the
shooting situation.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.